Thanks, David.
The rulebook seems to contradict the walkthrough about the issue of attacking more than one enemy where one enemy is fortified and one is not.
The rulebook says: "If some of the enemies are fortified ... only Siege Attacks can be played. You can play Ranged Attacks only if none of the targeted enemies are fortified.
The walkthrough says: "You can play multiple attacks in a phase. This way, you can fight enemies individually, or in small groups ... etc. This may be advantageous especially when:
--Some of the enemies are fortified and some are not. Thus, during the Ranged and Siege Attacks phase, you can only use Siege Attacks to attack fortified enemies, but you can use both Ranged and Siege Attacks to attack the non-fortified enemies."
Which rule do we follow? The walkthrough seems to be much more specific to the situation, but there's a direct contradiction with the wording in the rulebook.
The rulebook seems to contradict the walkthrough about the issue of attacking more than one enemy where one enemy is fortified and one is not.
The rulebook says: "If some of the enemies are fortified ... only Siege Attacks can be played. You can play Ranged Attacks only if none of the targeted enemies are fortified.
The walkthrough says: "You can play multiple attacks in a phase. This way, you can fight enemies individually, or in small groups ... etc. This may be advantageous especially when:
--Some of the enemies are fortified and some are not. Thus, during the Ranged and Siege Attacks phase, you can only use Siege Attacks to attack fortified enemies, but you can use both Ranged and Siege Attacks to attack the non-fortified enemies."
Which rule do we follow? The walkthrough seems to be much more specific to the situation, but there's a direct contradiction with the wording in the rulebook.