by tumorous
Faso74it wrote:
I agree with David, but I don't know why.
The attack value is +2 because it was Ice; now it's not Ice anymore, but it was increased, and stays increased.
In another sense, it seems unfair to me to play differently than what David suggested.
The attack value is +2 because it was Ice; now it's not Ice anymore, but it was increased, and stays increased.
In another sense, it seems unfair to me to play differently than what David suggested.
I don't see how the rulebook differentiates between ongoing or immediate effects in a way that allows us to definitively answer this question.
Is the city ability provided once and therefore a lasting effect that wouldn't be undone? Or an ongoing effect that could be undermined by cutting off its "if-then" application?
Both sorts of effects can exist in other games, so neither is sure to be the correct answer unless an official source points us in one direction or the other.